![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
By Jon Boroshok Despite the economic slowdown and dot-com layoffs, many tech companies are remaining in business, doing their best within a tight labor market. Because they have been reluctant to cut highly sought technical personnel, their public relations and marketing departments are often the first to be downsized, often to the point of counterproductivity. Some tech companies cutting back on marketing communications (marcom) in-house have begun looking outside their organizations for cost-effective public relations and other marcom services. They often discover that traditional tech PR agencies provide more services than necessary or require retainers in excess of $20,000 per month, which is frequently beyond their budgets, especially when a company is simply looking to beef up its own efforts. As they curb spending or downsize, economically astute companies will outsource marcom to providers who can pick up the slack and provide services on a smaller, flexible scale, often on a project-basis. Most traditional tech agencies have pricing and business models that are not designed to accommodate these needs, but smaller ("boutique") agencies, virtual PR teams, and individual practitioners are a growing alternative for companies of all sizes, particularly those with monthly marcom budgets under $10,000. Like their clients, these outsources have to work smarter, faster, and cheaper in a slowing economy. Working on a project basis usually goes against the grain of the profit models of larger agencies. Downtown offices with skyline views, employee salaries, benefits and equipment are all overhead costs that must be passed along to the client. Large agencies need steady retainers to make sure financial goals and obligations are met. They may offer prestigious addresses and recognizable names, but the actual account work is often performed by young, inexperienced staffers. In adapting to market changes, agencies are starting to resemble consulting firms, and smaller clients are again desirable as outsource providers find ways to profitably service them. Embracing the free agent economy, senior marcom practitioners living in the suburbs (better schools and affordable housing) are starting to "just say no" to adding two hours of daily commute time -- departing downtown agencies (or being let go out in favor of cheaper, junior staff) to work for their own clients and smaller agencies closer to home. This is creating more affordable, project-based PR/marcom options for many tech companies with refined, controlled budgets. For many clients, outsourced and project-based marcom has an economic rationale, even in a strong economy. It allows companies to do more short-term activities without a large commitment. It makes sense to find a marcom outsource that will work on a project basis, or adapt to a flexible, needs-based budget that allows clients to pay for resources and counsel on an "as-used" basis. If a project proves successful, they certainly can lead to longer-term relationships. Projects are a great "test drive" for both the agency and the client -- a way to see if they enjoy working together. Advice for tech companies looking to outsource marketing communications:
Jon Boroshok is the president of TechMarcom. He is a 15-year veteran of of high-tech marketing communications.
|